
#2PF · Charlotte Hornets
Height
6'7"
Weight
236 lbs
Age
27
College
Tennessee
Experience
6 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.8"
Reach
8'8.5"
Hand Size
9" × 10.5"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 407 | 6.8 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 42.4% | 37.7% | 77.8% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 28 | 6.8 | 3.9 | 1.7 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 4/17 | @ ORL | L 90-121 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-4 | -10 |
| Tue, 4/14 | vs MIA | W 127-126 | 18 | 5 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$27.9M
Guaranteed
$27.9M
AAV
$13.6M/yr
Grant Williams' two-year, $13.6M AAV deal with Charlotte represents a classic case of paying for potential rather than production, earning a C- Contract Value Index (CVI) grade. The former Celtics forward brings solid defensive versatility and three-point shooting ability, but his overall performance grade of C+ doesn't justify paying him above the $10-12M range typically reserved for reliable role players. At $13.6M annually, Williams is being compensated at a level that suggests franchise-caliber impact, yet his offensive limitations and inconsistent scoring output place him firmly in the above-average rotation player category. Charlotte essentially overpaid by $2-4M per year for a player who profiles as a solid starter but lacks the two-way impact to warrant this salary tier. While Williams can defend multiple positions and space the floor, his inability to create offense or dominate any single facet of the game makes this contract a questionable allocation of resources. The Hornets would have been better served targeting a more dynamic player at this price point or securing Williams' services for closer to $10M AAV.
Grant Williams earns a C+ Performance grade, reflecting league-average production for a power forward. Through 407 games, Grant is contributing 6.8 points, 3.9 rebounds, and 1.7 assists per game in his role. Grant's best relative area is FG% at 42.4, though it still falls below the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.7 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Grant ranks 29th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.4 |
| 0.4 |
| 42.4% |
| 37.6% |
| 83.3% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 16 | 10.4 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 43.9% | 36.5% | 83.8% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 76 | 10.3 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 45.6% | 37.5% | 75.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 15 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 47.2% | 45.0% | 80.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 24 | 8.6 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 43.3% | 39.3% | 80.8% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 5 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 17 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 57.7% | 58.8% | 70.0% |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 2-8 |
| 1-5 |
| -2 |
| Sun, 4/12 | @ NYK | W 110-96 | 21 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-4 | 2-3 | +16 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs DET | L 100-118 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-3 | -6 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ BOS | L 102-113 | 26 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 3-7 | -13 |
| Thu, 4/2 | vs PHX | W 127-107 | 21 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-10 | 2-8 | +8 |
Grant Williams is riding one of the warmer public narratives in the Eastern Conference right now, earning a B+ sentiment grade that significantly outpaces where his on-court production alone would place him. The driving force behind that gap is a genuinely compelling storyline: his return from ACL surgery has been framed by both local and national media not just as a roster move, but as an emotional homecoming, with coverage leaning heavily into his Charlotte roots, locker room leadership, and the defensive IQ he sharpened during his championship run in Boston. That intangible-heavy framing is doing real work, because his 2025-26 performance grade sits at a C+ — and his numbers reflect a solid but unspectacular rotation piece, as his 6.8 PPG, 3.9 RPG, and 1.7 APG across 28 games this season place him firmly in the above-average-role-player tier rather than the impact-starter conversation. The sentiment grade holds anyway because the recovery narrative gives media and fans permission to judge him on trajectory rather than current output, and headlines celebrating his locker room presence and character are actively shaping how Charlotte's fanbase processes what the numbers show. The only notable headwinds are roster-level churn — Charlotte has cycled through multiple roster moves in the last two weeks, including cuts and re-signings along the fringes — which, while not directed at Williams, introduces a background noise of organizational instability that has nudged the sentiment grade down from its recent peak. Still, with the Hornets sitting at 44-38 as a playoff-bubble team and Williams positioned as a veteran anchor, the narrative around him is one of the more durable feel-good stories in Charlotte sports: a hometown kid proving the Celtics were right about him all along.