Height
6'6"
Weight
230 lbs
Age
36
College
Michigan State
Experience
13 yrs
Wingspan
7'1.3"
Reach
8'9.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9.5"
Fan Verdict
Grade this player:

#23PF · Golden State Warriors
Height
6'6"
Weight
230 lbs
Age
36
College
Michigan State
Experience
13 yrs
Wingspan
7'1.3"
Reach
8'9.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9.5"
Grade this player:
| Year |
|---|
| Team |
|---|
| GP |
|---|
| PPG |
|---|
| RPG |
|---|
| APG |
|---|
| SPG |
|---|
| BPG |
|---|
| FG% |
|---|
| 3PT% |
|---|
| FT% |
|---|
| Career | ![]() | 939 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 41.5% | 32.1% | 71.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 59 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 41.5% | 32.2% | 69.6% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 12 | 9.1 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 38.9% | 26.7% | 69.2% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 55 | 8.6 | 7.2 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 49.7% | 39.5% | 73.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 12 | 9.4 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 46.2% | 25.0% | 72.7% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 22 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 6.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 47.9% | 20.5% | 63.8% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 63 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 8.9 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 44.7% | 27.0% | 79.5% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 43 | 8.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 38.9% | 27.9% | 75.9% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 22 | 13.3 | 10.1 | 8.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 49.8% | 22.8% | 71.8% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 21 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 8.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 43.2% | 26.6% | 79.6% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 17 | 13.1 | 9.1 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 44.7% | 41.0% | 68.7% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 23 | 15.4 | 9.9 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 43.1% | 36.5% | 73.8% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 21 | 13.7 | 10.1 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 41.7% | 26.4% | 73.6% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 7 | 11.9 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 46.7% | 27.6% | 79.2% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 12 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 42.9% | 39.1% | 76.5% |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/8 | vs SAC | W 110-105 | 27 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$53.6M
Guaranteed
$53.6M
AAV
$26.8M/yr
Draymond Green's contract with the Golden State Warriors earns a D Contract Value Index grade, indicating unfavorable value — the team is paying more than the on-court production warrants. Draymond Green's on-court production this season — 8.6 points per game with a C Performance grade — places him as an average contributor at the power forward position. His $26.8M average annual value represents near-max money in the current NBA salary landscape. The value equation works against the Golden State Warriors — the salary commitment outpaces the on-court production, limiting the team's financial flexibility to improve the roster elsewhere. As a veteran deep into his career, the aging curve is a risk factor — the team should expect declining production over the life of any remaining deal. The 2-year, $53.6M commitment is a moderate-length deal that balances commitment with flexibility.
Draymond Green earns a C Performance grade, reflecting league-average production for a power forward. Through 939 games, Draymond is contributing 8.6 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 5.3 assists per game in his role. Draymond's strongest area is APG at 5.3, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 4.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 8.6 (power forward median: 15.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Draymond ranks 31st.
The Warriors faithful and NBA media continue to view Draymond Green through a lens of grudging respect, recognizing his elite defensive impact and championship pedigree while acknowledging the growing questions about his $26.8M price tag. Green's reputation as a franchise-caliber defender and vocal leader remains intact, with recent coverage highlighting his mentorship role and basketball IQ rather than the technical fouls and ejections that dominated headlines in previous seasons. The disconnect between his B-grade public perception and A- level production reveals how narratives lag behind reality — Green's defensive versatility and playmaking from the forward spot continue to anchor Golden State's system, even as casual observers fixate on his offensive limitations and occasional sideline theatrics. For the sentiment to shift meaningfully upward, Green would need either a deep playoff run where his intangibles shine on the biggest stage, or a more consistent offensive contribution that justifies his veteran contract. Right now, he occupies that familiar space of being simultaneously undervalued by box score watchers and properly appreciated by those who understand winning basketball, with his championship résumé providing just enough benefit of the doubt to keep the narrative from turning truly sour.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...