
#7PG · Washington Wizards
Height
6'4"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
20
College
Pittsburgh
Experience
1 yrs
Grade Bub Carrington
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Bub Carrington grades out as a poor PG for Washington Wizards (F Impact). That places him 72nd of 93 graded point guards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as a slight overpay on the Contract Value Index (D+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a pro, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 164 | 10.7 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 42.4% | 37.4% | 76.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 82 | 10.7 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 82 | 10.7 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 42.4% | D+ D+ |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 82 | 9.8 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 40.1% | C- C- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
2 years
Total Value
$9.6M
Guaranteed
$9.6M
AAV
$4.7M/yr
Bub Carrington's contract with the Washington Wizards is graded as a D+ CVI. At $4.7M per year, the team is currently paying more than the on-court production warrants — a gap that needs to close for this deal to work out. Bub's production is currently below the league median for point guards, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $4.7M average annual value ranks as minimum-level money for the point guard market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — the team is paying a premium above the player's on-court value. At 20, Bub has years of development ahead, which adds significant upside to this contract. The 2-year deal keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
Bub Carrington earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA point guards this season. Through 164 games, Bub is contributing 10.7 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 4.6 assists per game in his role. Bub's strongest area is APG at 4.6, which compares favorably to the point guard median of 4.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 3.4 (point guard median: 5.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Bub ranks 72nd. As a All-Rookie 2nd Team talent at just 20, Bub's development trajectory suggests the best is yet to come for the Washington Wizards.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Bub's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Bub Carrington ranks 72nd of 93 graded point guards by performance. That slots Bub between Jordan Goodwin (D-) just ahead and Devin Carter (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
Jordan GoodwinPhoenix SunsD-Vit KrejciPortland Trail BlazersD-RayJ DennisAtlanta HawksD-Graded lower
Devin CarterSacramento KingsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Bub Carrington is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at PG for the Washington Wizards. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Bub Carrington, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance D-, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 0.2 |
| 42.4% |
| 40.8% |
| 73.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 82 | 9.8 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 40.1% | 33.9% | 81.2% |
The public perception surrounding Bub Carrington has settled into cautiously optimistic territory — a B- sentiment that reflects genuine excitement about his ceiling tempered by honest acknowledgment that he is still a work in progress. The clearest driver of that goodwill is a feature highlighting his relentless, iron-man mentality, which has done real work in shaping how both media and fans view him — less as lottery-team filler and more as a high-character building block worth investing attention in. His selection to the NBA Rising Stars event reinforces that framing, signaling league-wide recognition that his developmental trajectory is worth watching even if the wins haven't come on a 17-65 Wizards squad. On the production side, his C- performance grade tells the honest story: through 82 games in the 2025-26 season, he is putting up 10.7 PPG, 4.6 APG, and 3.4 RPG while shooting below 41 percent from the field, which is the profile of an intriguing developmental prospect rather than a proven contributor at the point guard position — and his ejection against Golden State added a disciplinary footnote that undercuts the iron-man narrative, however briefly. Washington's recent wave of roster additions — Gilbert, Richmond, Watkins, and Reese all signed within the last month — suggests the front office is actively populating the roster around its young core, and how Carrington handles competition for minutes and responsibilities will be the next real test of his standing. His All-Rookie 2nd Team selection from 2025 gives him a credible baseline of recognition, and the headline linking him to a Trae Young-related shift hints at a potential role evolution that could accelerate or complicate his development depending on how it unfolds. Right now the narrative is trending in the right direction — sentiment has climbed from C+ to B- over the last 30 days — but it remains a story about potential, not yet performance.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.