
#18C · San Antonio Spurs
Height
6'8"
Weight
255 lbs
Age
33
Experience
14 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 888 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 61.5% | 0.0% | 55.2% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 22 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | vs POR | W 114-95 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Sun, 4/26 | @ POR | W 114-93 | 2 | 0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
**Bismack Biyombo's Contract Value Index (CVI) earns a B- grade, reflecting solid value despite middling on-court production.** At just $2.3M AAV on a one-year deal, the veteran center provides the San Antonio Spurs with essential frontcourt depth at a price point that significantly outweighs his C- performance grade. While Biyombo's offensive limitations and declining athleticism keep him from being an impact player, his defensive awareness, rebounding instincts, and veteran leadership offer meaningful contributions for a rebuilding franchise. The short-term nature of this contract eliminates long-term risk while giving San Antonio flexibility to develop younger players or pivot in free agency. For a team prioritizing cost control and roster construction, securing a serviceable backup center who can absorb minutes and provide stability represents shrewd asset management. This deal exemplifies how veteran minimums can deliver outsized value when expectations align with production—Biyombo may be a replacement-level starter, but he's an above-average backup at an elite price point.
Bismack Biyombo earns a C- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 888 games, Bismack is contributing 1.0 points, 0.9 rebounds, and 0.2 assists per game in his role. Bismack's strongest area is FG% at 61.5, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.2 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Bismack ranks 60th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.2 |
| 0.0 |
| 61.5% |
| 0.0% |
| 71.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 28 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 58.8% | 0.0% | 40.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 40 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 56.5% | 0.0% | 48.1% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 8 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 56.3% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 9 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 64.7% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 58.7% | 0.0% | 44.8% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 53 | 7.4 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 54.3% | 0.0% | 60.3% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 54 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 63.7% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 82 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 52.0% | 0.0% | 65.0% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 81 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 52.8% | 0.0% | 53.4% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 20 | 6.2 | 9.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 58.0% | 0.0% | 59.7% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 64 | 4.8 | 6.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 54.3% | 0.0% | 58.3% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 3 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 60.0% | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 80 | 4.8 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 45.1% | 0.0% | 52.1% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 63 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 46.4% | 0.0% | 48.3% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| +2 |
| Mon, 4/20 | vs POR | W 111-98 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs DEN | L 118-128 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | -14 |
Public perception of Bismack Biyombo has settled firmly in negative territory, and the D sentiment grade reflects a fanbase and media landscape that has largely moved on from expecting anything meaningful from him on the court. The narrative driving that sentiment is bifurcated in a revealing way: positive coverage has migrated almost entirely to his humanitarian work in the Democratic Republic of Congo, including a well-attended fundraising gala backed by the Spurs organization, while basketball-focused analysts have grown pointed in their criticism, with at least one outlet declaring him already finished at the midway point of the 2025-26 season. That harsh basketball verdict aligns with a C- performance grade and counting stats that underscore the problem — in the 2025-26 season, Biyombo is averaging 1.0 PPG and 0.9 RPG across 22 games, numbers that represent genuine replacement-level output even by veteran-minimum standards. The Spurs' recent roster activity adds further context to his diminishing standing: the signing of Mason Plumlee and the addition of Emanuel Miller signal that San Antonio is actively filling frontcourt depth around him rather than relying on him, which only reinforces the perception that his roster spot is more ceremonial than functional. With San Antonio sitting at 62-20 as the No. 2 seed in the West and the playoffs bearing down fast, the organization has no margin to carry passengers, and the narrative around Biyombo reflects exactly that calculus — a beloved locker-room presence whose legacy is being written off the court long before his career is officially over.