
#44SG · Milwaukee Bucks
Height
6'6"
Weight
209 lbs
Age
24
College
UConn
Experience
2 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.8"
Reach
8'7.0"
Hand Size
8.25" × 9.5"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 161 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 27.0% | 34.0% | 64.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 38 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | @ PHI | L 106-126 | 30 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-2 | -2 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs BKN | W 125-108 | 15 | 0 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$4.6M
Guaranteed
$2.2M
AAV
$2.2M/yr
Andre Jackson Jr.'s $2.2M AAV deal with Milwaukee earns a solid B- on the Contract Value Index (CVI), representing strong value despite underwhelming on-court production. While Jackson's D+ performance grade reflects his limited offensive impact and inconsistent shooting, his modest salary keeps him well within the financial bounds of a developmental prospect. The Bucks are essentially paying replacement-level money for a young wing with defensive upside and athleticism, making this a low-risk investment that won't handcuff their salary cap flexibility. Jackson's two-year commitment provides Milwaukee with cost-controlled depth while giving the 22-year-old guard runway to develop his offensive game without major financial consequence. At $2.2M annually, the franchise is betting on potential rather than current production, and that conservative approach to a below-average performer creates legitimate surplus value. This represents smart roster construction—paying appropriately for a developmental piece rather than overpaying for marginal production.
Andre Jackson Jr. earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA shooting guards this season. Through 161 games, Andre is contributing 1.3 points, 1.1 rebounds, and 0.9 assists per game in his role. Andre's best relative area is FG% at 27.0, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 1.3 (shooting guard median: 15.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Andre ranks 93rd. At 24, Andre is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Milwaukee Bucks.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 |
| 27.0% |
| 20.0% |
| 90.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 5 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 45.5% | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-2 |
| 0-2 |
| -11 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ DET | L 111-137 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | +1 |
| Tue, 4/7 | @ BKN | L 90-96 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs BOS | L 101-133 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-3 | -3 |
Andre Jackson Jr.'s public standing enters the offseason on shaky ground, and the D sentiment grade is entirely consistent with the low-ceiling narrative that has defined his time in Milwaukee. The central storyline driving coverage is a fundamental offensive flaw — widely noted by analysts — that has now persisted through three professional seasons without meaningful correction, and the pressure to address it became explicit heading into 2025-26, with reporting framing a narrow window to demonstrate growth. That narrative aligns cleanly with his D+ performance grade; his 2025-26 numbers of 1.3 PPG, 1.1 RPG, and 0.9 APG across 38 games confirm he remains a fringe contributor whose case for roster security rests almost entirely on defensive versatility rather than any offensive or playmaking value. The Bucks' own roster maneuvering — a succession of cuts and short-term signings, including rest-of-season depth additions late in the year — reinforces the sense of an organization in flux and offers Jackson little organizational momentum to hide behind. His $2.22M deal, modest even by depth-piece standards, signals that Milwaukee sees him as an experiment worth carrying rather than a solution worth committing to, and the recent end-of-season review framing lumping him alongside other peripheral roster pieces only underscores that perception. With the team sitting at 32-50 and well outside playoff contention, there is no broader winning narrative to soften the individual critique. The bottom line: Jackson heads into the offseason as a player whose professional future hinges on resolving a documented flaw, and until that changes, the skepticism surrounding him is fully earned.