
#23 SP · Mets
Height
6'6"
Weight
240 lbs
Age
30
College
Oregon
Draft
2017, Rd 1, #20
Experience
6 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade David Peterson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, David Peterson grades out as a strong SP for Mets (B- Performance). That places him 94th of 252 graded starting pitchers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 144 | 4.2088237 | 40-35 | 670 | 1.3911765 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 13 | 5.18 | 3-5 | 56 | 1.59 | 57.1 | 1 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$8.1M
Guaranteed
$4.9M
AAV
$8.1M/yr
David Peterson's WAR-tier baseline and counting stats together earn a B- performance grade. The 2026 season numbers—3 wins and 56 strikeouts across 13 games—reflect a starter operating at a solid-contributor level rather than an ace, and his strikeout rate stands as his cleanest statistical foundation for rotation viability in a competitive league. His recent outings against quality opponents have been the real problem: he's absorbing disproportionate blame for a Mets team that has posted shutout losses and sits 13 games below .500 in what should be a competitive window. At 30 years old with seven seasons of big-league experience, Peterson is old enough that regression concerns are legitimate, yet young enough that a 2-3 month production spike could completely reshape the narrative—but right now, the media consensus is unforgiving: beat writers are openly discussing whether his rotation spot survives the stretch run, despite acknowledging he's "too good of a pitcher" to simply release. The Mets' frantic roster churn (six signings and moves in the last two weeks alone, including three additional relievers) signals organizational panic, and when a franchise is scrambling like that, starting pitchers become the easiest scapegoat for losing baseball. Peterson has 144 days left to prove the rotation-jeopardy chatter premature, but the sentiment damage—now sitting at a D-—suggests the window to flip the narrative is narrowing fast.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where David's contract sits relative to comparable money.
David Peterson ranks 94th of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots David between Jack Flaherty (B) just ahead and Doug Nikhazy (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Jack FlahertyTigersBTrevor McDonaldGiantsBChris BassittOriolesBGraded lower
Doug NikhazyWhite Sox| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 6/15 | @ CIN | L 0-12 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
David Peterson is a player in his 6th MLB season listed at SP for the Mets. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on David Peterson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance B-, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 30 |
| 4.22 |
| 9-6 |
| 150 |
| 1.37 |
| 168.2 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 21 | 2.90 | 10-3 | 101 | 1.29 | 121.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 27 | 5.03 | 3-8 | 128 | 1.57 | 111.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 28 | 3.83 | 7-5 | 126 | 1.33 | 105.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 5.54 | 2-6 | 69 | 1.40 | 66.2 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 10 | 3.44 | 6-2 | 40 | 1.21 | 49.2 | 0 |
David Peterson's public standing has cratered to one of the uglier narratives in the National League right now, with sentiment trending at a D- despite signs it is slowly clawing back from an outright F over the last 30 days. The core of the problem is straightforward: beat writers are openly questioning whether Peterson can hold his rotation spot, and a rough outing against the Dodgers became a lightning rod for criticism at a moment when the Mets could least afford it — a team sitting at 13-22 and struggling to string wins together. What makes the narrative particularly frustrating is the disconnect from his actual production, because his performance grade sits at a solid B, and coverage has acknowledged he is "too good of a pitcher" to simply cut loose, which means the scrutiny feels punitive rather than purely merit-based. The Mets' organizational chaos is amplifying everything — multiple roster and IL moves involving Ronny Mauricio, Luis Robert Jr., and Kodai Senga in the last two weeks paint a picture of a roster in flux, and when a franchise is scrambling like that, starting pitchers absorb disproportionate blame for losses. A first-round pick in 2017 and a six-year veteran at 30, Peterson is now in the uncomfortable position of pitching well enough to deserve his job while simultaneously fighting a public narrative that has already written his rotation obituary — and with 144 days left in the regular season, the window to flip this sentiment before it becomes self-fulfilling is still very much open.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.